About the author

Craig Cole

Founder of UltimateFIFA.com, Evertonian *groan*, entrepreneur. I'm a Chartered Member of the Chartered Institute for Securities and Investment which I put to good use in the Ultimate Team market. ;)

Related Articles

119 Comments

  1. 1

    Andy

    Bale 85, Hazard 87, Coloccini 80, Sessegnon 81, Gervinho 81….give me a break!

    Bale 83, Hazard 84, Coloccini 82, Sessegnon 79, Gervinho 77….more like it, Bale and Hazard are way overrated, Colo’s inclusion in the team of the year still seems to have not swayed EA into making him one of the best in the league, Vidic missed a full season and he’s an 89! As for Sessegnon? Decent player in an average side.

    Reply
    1. 1.1

      Keith

      You’re a moron who doesn’t know what they’re talking about, Hazard is arguably one of the most gifted and best players from his age range not a player better, by far better than Neymar.

      Reply
      1. 1.1.1

        Piers

        agreed. hazard is one of the best players in the world, and will soon be at a similar standard to the likes of messi, iniesta, ronaldo, rooney etc. and deserves at least a rating of 87. ‘Andy’, you’re knowledge of football is near to non-existent. Sessegnon is one of the best, and most intelligent, midfielders in the prem. Do you even watch MOTD??

        Reply
        1. 1.1.1.1

          Jordan

          Hazard is not one of the best players in the world OR MY WORD and saying that he will be like Messi and Ronaldo and Iniesta get a grip of yourself do you even know what you have just tried to say? Hazard will NEVER be as good as them 3 they are all on a different level you absolute creep !

          Reply
          1. 1.1.1.1.1

            nadroj

            Hazarad will become one of the best if not the best ..not yet..but he will get there .. Dont tell me u can see the future and predict he is shoite …get off ur high LOLiga horse and see the world i bet messi wouldnt score 50 in the premier league …LOLiga is a joke and so are u ..

          2. 1.1.1.1.2

            MattyB40

            You’re right Hazard has a decent start to the season with arguably the best midfield in the Premiership , no way is he better than Neymar , 87 too high , 120k coins – silly – 83 rating & worth around 60-80k coins , come on J Mata is different class , a 89 of anyone’s scores & 85 for Bale , he’s crap & Welsh & plays for Spurs , a 80 a best & your right about Vidic , he’s been injured for a year , great player but a 81 at the moment , Fifa have got the scores all wrong this year ,

        2. 1.1.1.2

          Oli

          Sessegnon was in the team of the year and scored goals, he was great in the prem and deserves 81 andy is a muppet

          Reply
        3. 1.1.1.3

          Joe

          MOTD is just annoying commentators who don’t know what they’re talking about! Football would be alot more enjoyable without them

          Reply
      2. 1.1.2

        dan

        are you stupid?!! Hazard is good but not that good. he cost way too much money for his actual worth. an 87 is too generous, he is not better than Ben Arfa or Valencia and nowhere near the ability of Ronaldo or Messi. Mate, whats the point talking about something you no so little about, you stupid moron

        Reply
      3. 1.1.3

        Joe

        Hazard is no good i’m surprised Chelsea haven’t sold him to Aston villa yet,Open your eyes he should be 80 at his best

        Reply
    2. 1.2

      Higor

      dude their overall are fine

      Reply
    3. 1.3

      Mike

      Your ratings are just arbitrary mate. You are disagreeing with people who’s actual job it is to rate these players to reflect as close to the real world as possible. You are just a guy in an armchair who thinks he knows better. Personally I don’t think Bale is as good as most people think he is (coming from a Welsh man) but his score on the game should reflect what MOST people think.

      If you don’t like it, just edit the players stats in game and you can make players as good or bad as you want. I did it last year for some younger players, I’m sure you can do it this year.

      Are you a Newcastle fan by any chance? Randomly picking Sességnon to mark down, and the only player you think is underrated is a Newcastle player.

      Reply
    4. 1.4

      Andy

      Hazard 87 what has he done in football. It’s a joke just because 1 person says he’s quality everyone listens. Ur all blind he is 80 at best

      Reply
      1. 1.4.1

        Steven Shezney

        Shutup you ****, hazard is sick you need to open your eyes you blind **********, what haveyou ever done in football apart from slag off one of the best players in europe you *******.

        Reply
        1. 1.4.1.1

          Joe

          No need to get angry its just his opinion as you would say you ****

          Reply
      2. 1.4.2

        nadroj

        Hazard was young player ogf the year in france for two years and then the player of the year last year ……what else do y ou need to fukn prove ?? …who are u ?? GOD ??

        Reply
        1. 1.4.2.1

          Edward

          Oooooo Player of the year in the french league…steady on.

          Reply
        2. 1.4.2.2

          tattybojangles

          naaaaaa blud messi is god doeeeeeeeeeeeeee

          Reply
        3. 1.4.2.3

          Joe

          French League is NOT that good you know take it your a Chelsea supporter as i am a Liverpool Supporter i would you’ll always walk alone

          Reply
  2. 2

    Max

    Cleverly 78. That’s not tight.

    Reply
  3. 3

    Ash

    Kyle Walker PFA young player of the year and only 78?!??! that is completely ridiculous. should be around 81-82.

    Reply
    1. 3.1

      Jezamiah

      Walker has a great opening start to his prem career but he’s constantly overrated and hasn’t proven yet that he’s the whole package (Defending and attacking). I would say 81 highest.

      Cleverly 78 is about right i think even though i would like him higher

      Reply
  4. 4

    Blair

    I agree with Andy! Vidic in no reality should be 89. Vicent Kompany is a better defender and is rated 4 points below him!

    Reply
  5. 5
  6. 6

    Jay

    Cisse (QPR) better than Jelavic (Everton)? Explain…

    Reply
    1. 6.1

      Nickfoley25

      Everton are underrated every season, in total everton should at least have 4 players over 80 rating such as fellaini, jelavic, howard and baines. Its absolute bull the ratings for the squad, fellaini is one of the best up and coming central midfielders who performs at a consistent high level and is wanted by some of the best teams in the world. Some may argue baines is in the top 5 LB in the world, hes a consistent, dominant player in his position. Howard is also I consistent keeper who controls the back line very well, compare him reina for instance, dont get me wrong reina is a brilliant keeper but makes too many mistakes unlike howard who makes key decisions that can make or break a match. And I don’t even have to justify jelavic, not the most skilled player but he can score from almost any position/situation

      Reply
      1. 6.1.1

        Rob

        totally agree with you, everton are underrated every year, its a joke, jags aswel, should be 81 not 79 jelavic 77… 11 goals in 13 games last season since January… kone for wigan is better rating and thats not right!! wigan battle for survival most seasons while we battle for europe… fellaini only being 80?! he dominates teams when in form, and would real madrid, utd and chelsea be after a 80 rating player?! glen johnson playing left back is one rating less than baines?! players at fulham better than any player at everton?! do one EA… another thing that annoys me is that suarez has the worst shots on goal to goals ratio in the prem last season yet hes a 86 or 87 rating player and has like 85 finishing (did on fifa12), that should be the case, atm this season we are 3rd in the league, LFC are 18th without a win in the opening 5 games yet they are STILL overrated and EFC are STILL every much underrated. i will either not buy the game, or if i do, change the ratings to RESPECTABLE ratings, eg fellaini being 82/83, baines the same, jags 81 jelavic i think is a 80/81.

        sort it out EA.

        Reply
        1. 6.1.1.1

          Rob

          *that shouldnt be the case*

          Reply
  7. 7

    Angus

    Why have they completely ruined the premier league? It is in no way realistic. I bet everyone in the Spanish league is rated over 90 as usual.

    Reply
    1. 7.1

      Matty G

      Don’t be an idiot the Spanish league is as awesome as my six pack and the whole world knows how awesome that is.

      Reply
    2. 7.2

      Adam

      I agree completely! Good point!

      Reply
      1. 7.2.1

        Prince from meadowfield paki's

        BEN ARFA IS ONLY 81 THAT IS BULL SHIT IF HE PLAYED FOR MAN UTD HE WOULD BE ATLEAST 85

        Reply
        1. 7.2.1.1

          SWAG

          but he dosen’t so that the way it is stop complaining #YOLO

          Reply
        2. 7.2.1.2

          JAMES H

          if he played for man utd or chelsea and now City he would be about 100 lol suroise rooney and vanpersie are not 101
          rating

          Reply
  8. 8

    danski

    Why is Man Utd’s budget so low? They spent that much on Van Persie 22 million and then bought Kagawa, Buttner & Powell for about the same combined. Maybe about 40 million would be a realist budget.

    Reply
    1. 8.1

      jmoore

      I’m thinking this is not the amateur budget

      Reply
    2. 8.2

      Lewis

      Exactly… They bought those players…

      Reply
  9. 9

    windstyle

    Danski this 23 m budget is even so overated.Manutd are curently owing so many money to the banks i dont even know how many that is.But really chelsea 50m from wining champions league throwing away around 100m for transfers and 40m only !?!?!Like man sity 89m haha..

    Reply
  10. 10

    danny

    wigan better than norwich? surely wigan should be 3.5?

    Reply
  11. 11

    starkey

    everton are so underated on fifas ea need to sort it out

    Reply
  12. 12

    phil

    everton underrated badly

    Reply
    1. 12.1

      dan

      need to sort Baines, pienar should be 80 and if suarez is 86 jelavic should be 84

      Reply
      1. 12.1.1

        isaac

        I think I have seen four comments now about how underated Everton are and i agree but you are naming players like jelavic as saying hes underated but I think Phil Jagielka should be atleast 83 he is one of the top English defenders but is constintly underreated.

        Reply
        1. 12.1.1.1

          isaac

          soz ^^Everton are underrated^^ :)

          Reply
  13. 13

    JoshStocks

    i hope they edit the ratings before being released on teams such as west brom and everton should be much higher torres should be 82/83 not happy with the united budget.

    Reply
  14. 14

    joseph

    Nigerians are very angry with fifa because our national team played well this year and were not even considered they prefered cameroon who are flops fifa sucks

    Reply
  15. 15

    joseph

    Its not fair Nigeria played well Nigeria should be in fifa 13 we are not happy

    Reply
  16. 16

    zak

    really gerrard 83 really

    Reply
    1. 16.1

      Alex

      I know, It quite bad and this is cuz he has been injury. Why is vidic rating not gone down cuz he was out for a whole season. At least Liverpool rating isn’t has bad as I thought.

      Reply
  17. 17

    james

    Cant believe cleverly is only 78. Ashley young has gone down to. the people who decide the ratings are largly clueless.

    Reply
  18. 18

    Gareth

    Cleverley 78? thats a joke, United 23m budget another joke and worst of all second half of the season scholes was arguably the best midfielder and again he’s 81? sort it out ea Prem is better than the spanish league and i bet Mardid and Barca all get 85+ ratings

    Reply
    1. 18.1

      Higor

      yeah but real madrid and barcelona are way better than the premier league

      Reply
      1. 18.1.1

        Higor

        I meant way better than the teams in the premier league

        Reply
  19. 19

    Lewis

    Swansea’s budget is sooooo not that low…

    They sold;

    Rodgers and backroom – 7m
    Sinclair – 8.2m
    Allen – 15m
    and some other randomers probably getting about 1-1.5 between them…

    They also finished mid table.

    even with laudrup and some higher wages etc that should be almost 30 to spend.

    Then players bought;

    Hernandez – 5.5
    Ki – 5.5
    Bartley – 1
    Chico – 2
    Michu – 2
    and some youths and a few loans that I’d be surprised if much over 2m.

    That’s 18m…

    Even if we estimate high on buys and wages and low on sales their budget should definitely be nearer 10.

    Reply
    1. 19.1

      Lewis

      As for their player ratings, I think Rangel should be 1 lower and taylor 1 higher. And chico should be a couple lower.

      Reply
    2. 19.2

      Mike

      I’d agree with you if the players they bought were not in the team at the beginning, but they are. So giving them 30m, plus already having Ki, Pablo, Chico etc, would be ridiculous. The budgets have to reflect what they would have at the beginning of the summer, not after all their sales, because the money from sales has been spent.

      Reply
  20. 20

    moooo

    Arsenal
    Podolski 86 Gervinho 83
    Arteta 83 Walcott 83
    Mertesacker 82
    Santi Cazorla 86
    Mannone 72
    diaby 78
    Vermaelen 85
    Jenkinson 65
    gibbs 79
    ramsey 77

    Reply
    1. 20.1

      Nathan

      Jenkinson has been playing too well to be only 65, i’d say 78 at least, gibbs too deserves 80, the ox should be at least 80, Koscielny 83, Gervinho 82, Poldi 85, Walcott 81 is fair

      Reply
      1. 20.1.1

        Mike

        Jenkinosn has only played well this season though. Last year he was more than a little nervy.

        The weekly update system for form will put his stats up.

        Reply
  21. 21

    Benji

    Everton… seriously need to be reviewed. the 4.5 rating is fine, however one player over 80?
    compared to Lpool players/performance this is ridiculous

    Reply
    1. 21.1

      dan

      so true i dont see how baines argubly the best lb in the leagues rated so bad and jelavics more than ten behind suarez – discrace

      Reply
      1. 21.1.1

        Daniel

        Are you serious?! Suarez IS better than Jelavic. Suarez should easily be 86. Jelavic sucks

        Reply
        1. 21.1.1.1
  22. 22

    bradlee lewedio

    odemwinge should be 90

    Reply
    1. 22.1

      b

      no hes awful and selfish and should be prison for his crimes against football

      Reply
  23. 23

    dan

    come on ea sort Evertons ratings out by friday

    Reply
  24. 24

    Daniel

    I seriously hope this is a joke. 2 great seasons and West Brom are still rated 3.5, less than
    Wigan and Swansea. With all due respect to these teams, we had a much better season than Wigan and Swansea. McAuley’s rating hasn’t moved when he has been fantastic and Olsson could quite easily be rated 77/78. Foster should be an 80 like he was at Birmingham, he hasn’t got any worse, if anything he has got better so i don’t see why the rating went down. The Canadians should stick to snowboarding and let the English stick to the football.

    Reply
  25. 25

    Billy

    Why r livpool so bad, shud be 5 star but we just as bad as everton almost?? WHY GERRARD NOT 85 AT LEAST. F U EA. I still buy but not happy indeed.

    Reply
    1. 25.1

      Daniel

      I know he’s seriously underrated and ive been told Rooney supposed to be 94! WTF. Gerrard is and always will be better than Rooney!!!

      Reply
    2. 25.2

      Josh

      5 Star??? Don’t make me laugh.

      Maybe they have these ratings because they have played Man United, Arsenal & Man City all at home and got 1pt out of 9. Currently they are in the relegation zone with 2pts from 5 games, 3 of them home games and couldn’t manage to beat Sunderland and lost to WBA!!

      Stop living in the 80’s and realise Liverpool are no longer a top 4 team.

      Gerrard maybe should be 84 but Liverpool are definitely a 4.5 and not 5 star team…

      Reply
      1. 25.2.1

        Baines

        Liverpool supporters are hilarious

        Reply
      2. 25.2.2

        stew

        I’m a Liverpool fan and I agree 4.5, I even thought we were gonna go down to 4, but Gerrard should at least be 85, Agger, 84/85 and Skrtel at least 83… Oh and a boost for Sterling too. The likes of Downing, Adam etc. should depreciate.

        Reply
    3. 25.3

      bob

      what are you on about Gerrard’s to old now and liverpool finished 6th were as spurs and Newcastle + possibly arsnel but they lost vanpersie should be 5 star as they finished 3rd 4th and 5th all above chelsea and liverpool

      Reply
  26. 26

    Ben

    i feel Jenkinson has been harddone to only being 66 the way he has started this season he should atleast be 70-71

    Reply
    1. 26.1

      JAMES H

      just up his rating on your own you know fifa always makes man utd and chelsea good lol VIDIC 89 really lol vermaelen is as good if Hazard is 87 thats a joke

      Reply
  27. 27

    Zoomer

    This is ridiculous. These teams are overrated. Fulham, QPR, Stoke, Wigan, Sunderlad 4 star????!!! Liverpool 4.5?!! WTF! Bayern, Real, Barca must be 7 star then.

    Reply
  28. 28

    arun elavaras

    de jong in man city…i think its fake

    Reply
    1. 28.1

      Craig Cole

      These screenshots were taken before the latest round of transfers.

      Reply
  29. 29

    aleks

    allen should be around 81, 82 gerrard should be 85. horrible ratings fifa.

    Reply
    1. 29.1

      aleks

      sterling should be 76

      Reply
  30. 30

    unknown

    how can they put cazorla as 84, are they high on drugs when they rate their players?? he should be atleast 87

    Reply
  31. 31

    Tamas Nagy

    This is a joke??? Wigan is 4 stars while Aston Villa is only 3.5!!! WTF???

    Reply
  32. 32

    Kasper Nygaard

    What level is it on? – amateur, world class, or what+

    Reply
  33. 33

    b

    everyones overreacting when you play career mode the ratings go up anyways

    Reply
  34. 34

    Ed

    They have massively underrated the QPR budget.. I mean only 8 million? They bought Granero for 9 million, and M’Bia for about 5. Surely that budget should be a lot higher, and they also still have a lot of money left, especially as their owner has his own F1 team and his own airline..

    Reply
  35. 35

    Yeshua

    I think people forget (or didn’t know in the first place) that Hazard has won the UNFP Ligue 1 Player of the Year twice and “…has earned critical acclaim for his playing style, which has led to the media, coaches, and players drawing comparisons to FIFA World Player of the Year winners Lionel Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo.”

    Reply
  36. 36

    Daniel

    Liverpool has to be one of the most underrated teams. Sterling 68, Allen 78, Borini 77 and Gerrard 83??????!!!!!! are you kidding me.Sterling shouls at least be more than 70, Allen should easily be an 80 or 81, Borini should be a 79 or 80 and Gerrard should at least be an 88. He’s the best midfielder in the premier league for god sake!!!

    Reply
    1. 36.2

      Luke

      Lampard is easily better than gerrard, however they both should be higher ratings like last year lampard should be 86-87 and gerrard 85-86

      Reply
  37. 37

    Jack

    get a grip the lot of u ******* nerds hahahah

    Reply
  38. 39

    JAMES H

    VIDIC 89 HAVING A LAUGH HIS ALWAYS INJURED not surpise though he does play for man utd so they make all there players better

    Reply
    1. 39.1

      Paul

      hahahahahaha vidic is one of the best defenders in the prem u pleb

      Reply
      1. 39.1.1

        stew

        That’s complete bullcrap.He is constantly injured, and apparently, Agger is 83?!??! That’s. Just underrating. The second year in a row and he was fit and effective most of last season.

        Reply
        1. 39.1.1.1

          Tom

          Vidic is one of the best CBs in the world, just because he spent a season out doesn’t mean he should be rated less… and maybe if Liverpool played half decent for once they would have better ratings.

          Reply
  39. 40

    Tom

    why west ham budget so low we bought Jarvis for 10.5 million and signed Carroll

    Reply
    1. 40.1

      Joseph B

      because they signed those players, if you had those players and a big budget it would be stupid, fulham sold dempsey and dembele for more than 20 million and the budget is only 10

      Reply
  40. 41

    Bob

    why does everyone love gerrard so much hes shit and completley overated at 83

    Reply
    1. 41.1

      Daniel

      How the hell is gerrard rubbish? He’s freakin amazin. I bet u you your a man utd fanboy who thinks rooneys the best player in the world. If u think gerrards rubbish then u dont know footbal

      Reply
    2. 41.2

      stew

      Gerrard is shit? Definitely a Man Utd fan. Wake up and realise that just like RVP, if he joined man utd, they would worship him, and he’ll be like 97.

      Reply
      1. 41.2.1

        Tom

        Late to the party, but who cares? Gerrard is useless. Utterly useless and I’m an Arsenal fan, before you ask.

        He has consistently underperformed for the last 2 years, he has scored 4 goals from open play in 14 months in the league. He is a bag of wank.

        Scholes, Lampard & Wilshere are 3 English CM’s that are better than him currently. Lampard is possibly dropping away but that’s partially because he’s benched with the income of “the 3 amigos” into the Chelski side. Still, when he plays he does a better job than Gerrard.

        Just look at Liverpools position, the only player in the Liverpool squad that looks above decent is Suarez and he’s still overrated in terms of finishing, he has averaged 9 shots a game this season. In two separate games he had 16 shots and managed to only put 4 and 6 on target in those games. He is a GREAT player, but not a great finisher. Stats don’t lie.

        In my honest opinion about the Arsenal side:
        Gervinho – overrated, should be 75 at best.
        Chamakh – should not be gold on FUT. 74, max.
        Jenkinson – underrated, should be 72/73.
        Ramsey – overrated, again should be 75 at best.
        Sagna – overrated, should be 80 at best, he consistently under performs, has a terrible touch and his pace is gone.
        Walcott – I think is slightly underrated, the last 2 seasons before this one he had started to show he can finish and he’s continued it this year, he should be 82/83 in my opinion.
        Fabianksi – How is he still gold in FUT? He is useless.
        Gibbs – Underrated, should be at least 80. But in fairness he has always struggled to keep fit. My only complaint is that if Vidic holds 89 even though he’s missed more than an entire season through injury, surely Gibbs shouldn’t be negatively rated because of his injuries?

        Reply
  41. 42

    suliman

    raheem sterling 68! are you mad more like 75

    Reply
  42. 43

    Bob Cazoling Roberto Suterio

    Hello
    Heskey – 99

    Reply
    1. 43.1

      Tom

      No word of a lie, I made him 99 in all stats on my FIFA13.

      Reply
    2. 43.2

      emmitt

      Good luck with that

      Reply
  43. 44

    Luke

    I can’t believe no one has mentioned Wayne Rooney’s stupidly high rating i mean come on he only ever scores penalties or some poor to average quality goals, and how come vidic is still 89 he didnt play at all last season and he wasnt even that good before! also in the championship teams many players are really low like michael chopra went down 4 and many others lost rating aswell.

    CHELSEA ALL THE WAY!!!

    Reply
  44. 45

    Joseph B

    how is no one complaining about fulham, they sold dembele and dempsey and got a small budget, and they finished one place below liverpool last year beating them twice.

    Reply
  45. 46

    T-rodney

    That’s not fair why is Rooney and Ashley downgraded.

    Reply
  46. 47

    Joe

    LOOOOOOOOOOOOL Everton Best player is Tim Howard (GK) worst player is an Midfielder who can play attacking midfield!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  47. 48

    Mason

    Why is Chelsea’s budget so low: we spent 80 million in summer and still want more!

    Reply
  48. 49

    josh

    tbh ur all complaining about crap FIFA rated these players and it only matters how the players play in-game. I think that QPR bugdet is too low they could compete with man city and chelsea etc in a transfer market if they wanted. Vidic is the best cb in the world so shut up Everton this and everton that Everton run on david moyed without him theyd be screwed and as for jelavic he has no pace and is lucky to be rated 77 more like a 74 silver on FUT. AND finally hazard is class he could walk around half the teams in the prem Wigan Everton sunderland etc 4 4.5 and 3.5 star teams dont make me laugh FIFA need a 10 star rating system not 5

    Reply
    1. 49.1

      zam

      totally agree with @josh,but seriously EA need to improve a lot in the cmg years

      Reply
    2. 49.2

      Kevin

      Vidic is not even nominated to the top 20 defenders in the world so i dont think so, Thiago Silva all the way!

      Reply
    3. 49.3

      EFC till i die

      josh you do not know anything if you think that vidic is the best centre back in the world. He WAS but now he is just decent, and everton are a great team (not being arragant because I support them)with limited resources and yes David Moyes has had a massive influence on us but that’s because our board are LOYAL.(man utd by seeing you boner about vidic). Also if you did happen to know anything about football you would understand that pace isn’t everything, but you get dis-illusioned with the game because 1. you don’t know the game anyway. and 2. fifa isn’t too realistic- pace dominates the game so you assume that a REAL LIFE STRIKER is poor because he has no pace.  Your Hazard observation is true but you need to learn a bit more about the game because you are DUM when it comes to REAL-LIFE football!

      Reply
  49. 50

    Dre

    Its just a stupid game, if you are unhappy then you edit the players to whatever rating you choose. Edit gerrard to 88 if you wish, edit Vidic to 81 if you wish… you bought the game so suit yourself and stop complaining. There will always be discrepancies, ppl will always want their favourite players to be rated high. Eg. Gerrard, Liverpool fans want him at 88, Everton/ManU fans would say he his 78 at most, EA averaged it to be 83… wats the big deal. Grow up you kids! there is life OUTSIDE of FIFA, a life filled with fun things, money, sex, religion or just the fact that you are breathing should make you happy. Cheer up you sorry ‘gameheads’. ROFL

    Reply
    1. 50.1

      Tom

      I’m sorry but while what you are saying is kind of right, in terms of people will always want certain people rated differently from someone else. Your point about getting a life is kind of redundant, you’ve gone out of your way to insult people on a comments section of a website, think about that.

      I won’t recheck this. I don’t care if me replying to you means I don’t have a life. I’m okay with that. Are you?

      Reply
  50. 52

    emmitt

    Baggies and red men all the way

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


2014 Powered By Wordpress, Goodnews Theme By Momizat Team