FIFA 13 New Skills Tutorial
Previous
RANDOM
FIFA 13 First Touch Control Explained
Next

FIFA 13 Premier League Teams Star Ratings and Budgets

by Craig ColeSeptember 7, 2012

If you’re anything like me, you can’t wait to get cracking on your FIFA 13 Career Mode. If you were thinking of taking over one of the FIFA 13 premiership teams this list of team star ratings and starting budgets will give you plenty of time to mull over your decision.

FIFA 13 Team Star Ratings

There are only three 5 star teams in the Premiership this year, defending champions Manchester City, Manchester United and Chelsea (no prizes for guessing who they were I’m afraid…)

The lowest teams rating’s was 3.5 stars.

No guesses either for guessing which team’s got the biggest budget!

FIFA 13 Team Star Rating and Budgets

Team Stars Overall Budget Wage Budget
Arsenal 4.5 Stars £19,000,000 £1,303,250
Aston Villa 3.5 Stars £9,500,000 £425,250
Chelsea 5 Stars £39,500,000 £1,490,750
Everton 4.5 Stars £7,500,000 £504,000
Fulham 4 Stars £10,500,000 £516,750
Liverpool 4.5 Stars £16,000,000 £1,024,000
Manchester City 5 Stars £83,000,000 £1,024,000
Manchester United 5 Stars £23,500,000 £1,745,500
Newcastle 4.5 Stars £13,500,000 £590,750
Norwich City 3.5 Stars £5,000,000 £175,250
Reading 3.5 Stars £6,500,000 £180,500
QPR 4 Stars £8,000,000 £354,750
Southampton 3.5 Stars £6,000,000 £180,500
Sunderland 4 Stars £12,500,000 £352,500
Stoke City 4 Stars £12,000,000 £360,500
Swansea City 4 Stars £5,500,000 £266,500
Spurs 4.5 Stars £17,500,000 £1,005,250
West Bromwich Albion 3.5 Stars £6,500,000 £280,250
West Ham United 3.5 Stars £6,000,000 £234,750
Wigan Athletic 4 Stars £6,500,000 £252,750

FIFA 13 Team Star Rating and Budgets Screenshots

All stats are subject to change up right up until release.

Thanks to FIFAGamersblog

You can also check out the list of FIFA 13 Leagues, all of the International Teams in FIFA 13 and the full FIFA 13 Soundtrack.

Craig Cole
Founder of UltimateFIFA.com, Evertonian *groan*, entrepreneur. I'm a Chartered Member of the Chartered Institute for Securities and Investment which I put to good use in the Ultimate Team market. ;)
119 Comments
Leave a response
  • Andy
    September 8, 2012 at 1:47 pm

    Bale 85, Hazard 87, Coloccini 80, Sessegnon 81, Gervinho 81….give me a break!

    Bale 83, Hazard 84, Coloccini 82, Sessegnon 79, Gervinho 77….more like it, Bale and Hazard are way overrated, Colo’s inclusion in the team of the year still seems to have not swayed EA into making him one of the best in the league, Vidic missed a full season and he’s an 89! As for Sessegnon? Decent player in an average side.

    • Keith
      September 12, 2012 at 6:18 am

      You’re a moron who doesn’t know what they’re talking about, Hazard is arguably one of the most gifted and best players from his age range not a player better, by far better than Neymar.

      • Piers
        September 16, 2012 at 9:54 pm

        agreed. hazard is one of the best players in the world, and will soon be at a similar standard to the likes of messi, iniesta, ronaldo, rooney etc. and deserves at least a rating of 87. ‘Andy’, you’re knowledge of football is near to non-existent. Sessegnon is one of the best, and most intelligent, midfielders in the prem. Do you even watch MOTD??

        • Jordan
          September 26, 2012 at 5:38 pm

          Hazard is not one of the best players in the world OR MY WORD and saying that he will be like Messi and Ronaldo and Iniesta get a grip of yourself do you even know what you have just tried to say? Hazard will NEVER be as good as them 3 they are all on a different level you absolute creep !

          • nadroj
            September 28, 2012 at 2:13 pm

            Hazarad will become one of the best if not the best ..not yet..but he will get there .. Dont tell me u can see the future and predict he is shoite …get off ur high LOLiga horse and see the world i bet messi wouldnt score 50 in the premier league …LOLiga is a joke and so are u ..

          • November 13, 2012 at 11:13 pm

            You’re right Hazard has a decent start to the season with arguably the best midfield in the Premiership , no way is he better than Neymar , 87 too high , 120k coins – silly – 83 rating & worth around 60-80k coins , come on J Mata is different class , a 89 of anyone’s scores & 85 for Bale , he’s crap & Welsh & plays for Spurs , a 80 a best & your right about Vidic , he’s been injured for a year , great player but a 81 at the moment , Fifa have got the scores all wrong this year ,

        • Oli
          October 4, 2012 at 5:51 pm

          Sessegnon was in the team of the year and scored goals, he was great in the prem and deserves 81 andy is a muppet

        • October 23, 2012 at 2:43 pm

          MOTD is just annoying commentators who don’t know what they’re talking about! Football would be alot more enjoyable without them

      • dan
        September 30, 2012 at 2:20 pm

        are you stupid?!! Hazard is good but not that good. he cost way too much money for his actual worth. an 87 is too generous, he is not better than Ben Arfa or Valencia and nowhere near the ability of Ronaldo or Messi. Mate, whats the point talking about something you no so little about, you stupid moron

      • October 23, 2012 at 2:51 pm

        Hazard is no good i’m surprised Chelsea haven’t sold him to Aston villa yet,Open your eyes he should be 80 at his best

    • Higor
      September 22, 2012 at 8:40 pm

      dude their overall are fine

    • Mike
      September 26, 2012 at 8:29 pm

      Your ratings are just arbitrary mate. You are disagreeing with people who’s actual job it is to rate these players to reflect as close to the real world as possible. You are just a guy in an armchair who thinks he knows better. Personally I don’t think Bale is as good as most people think he is (coming from a Welsh man) but his score on the game should reflect what MOST people think.

      If you don’t like it, just edit the players stats in game and you can make players as good or bad as you want. I did it last year for some younger players, I’m sure you can do it this year.

      Are you a Newcastle fan by any chance? Randomly picking Sességnon to mark down, and the only player you think is underrated is a Newcastle player.

    • Andy
      September 28, 2012 at 7:07 am

      Hazard 87 what has he done in football. It’s a joke just because 1 person says he’s quality everyone listens. Ur all blind he is 80 at best

      • Steven Shezney
        September 28, 2012 at 8:49 am

        Shutup you ****, hazard is sick you need to open your eyes you blind **********, what haveyou ever done in football apart from slag off one of the best players in europe you *******.

      • nadroj
        September 28, 2012 at 2:15 pm

        Hazard was young player ogf the year in france for two years and then the player of the year last year ……what else do y ou need to fukn prove ?? …who are u ?? GOD ??

  • Max
    September 9, 2012 at 9:59 am

    Cleverly 78. That’s not tight.

  • Ash
    September 9, 2012 at 11:46 am

    Kyle Walker PFA young player of the year and only 78?!??! that is completely ridiculous. should be around 81-82.

    • Jezamiah
      September 18, 2012 at 11:44 pm

      Walker has a great opening start to his prem career but he’s constantly overrated and hasn’t proven yet that he’s the whole package (Defending and attacking). I would say 81 highest.

      Cleverly 78 is about right i think even though i would like him higher

  • Blair
    September 9, 2012 at 4:14 pm

    I agree with Andy! Vidic in no reality should be 89. Vicent Kompany is a better defender and is rated 4 points below him!

  • s
    September 12, 2012 at 7:24 pm

    cleverly!no no!

  • Jay
    September 13, 2012 at 6:56 pm

    Cisse (QPR) better than Jelavic (Everton)? Explain…

    • Nickfoley25
      September 26, 2012 at 1:09 am

      Everton are underrated every season, in total everton should at least have 4 players over 80 rating such as fellaini, jelavic, howard and baines. Its absolute bull the ratings for the squad, fellaini is one of the best up and coming central midfielders who performs at a consistent high level and is wanted by some of the best teams in the world. Some may argue baines is in the top 5 LB in the world, hes a consistent, dominant player in his position. Howard is also I consistent keeper who controls the back line very well, compare him reina for instance, dont get me wrong reina is a brilliant keeper but makes too many mistakes unlike howard who makes key decisions that can make or break a match. And I don’t even have to justify jelavic, not the most skilled player but he can score from almost any position/situation

      • Rob
        September 28, 2012 at 1:05 pm

        totally agree with you, everton are underrated every year, its a joke, jags aswel, should be 81 not 79 jelavic 77… 11 goals in 13 games last season since January… kone for wigan is better rating and thats not right!! wigan battle for survival most seasons while we battle for europe… fellaini only being 80?! he dominates teams when in form, and would real madrid, utd and chelsea be after a 80 rating player?! glen johnson playing left back is one rating less than baines?! players at fulham better than any player at everton?! do one EA… another thing that annoys me is that suarez has the worst shots on goal to goals ratio in the prem last season yet hes a 86 or 87 rating player and has like 85 finishing (did on fifa12), that should be the case, atm this season we are 3rd in the league, LFC are 18th without a win in the opening 5 games yet they are STILL overrated and EFC are STILL every much underrated. i will either not buy the game, or if i do, change the ratings to RESPECTABLE ratings, eg fellaini being 82/83, baines the same, jags 81 jelavic i think is a 80/81.

        sort it out EA.

  • Angus
    September 13, 2012 at 8:39 pm

    Why have they completely ruined the premier league? It is in no way realistic. I bet everyone in the Spanish league is rated over 90 as usual.

  • danski
    September 14, 2012 at 10:36 am

    Why is Man Utd’s budget so low? They spent that much on Van Persie 22 million and then bought Kagawa, Buttner & Powell for about the same combined. Maybe about 40 million would be a realist budget.

  • windstyle
    September 14, 2012 at 1:03 pm

    Danski this 23 m budget is even so overated.Manutd are curently owing so many money to the banks i dont even know how many that is.But really chelsea 50m from wining champions league throwing away around 100m for transfers and 40m only !?!?!Like man sity 89m haha..

  • danny
    September 17, 2012 at 10:19 pm

    wigan better than norwich? surely wigan should be 3.5?

  • starkey
    September 19, 2012 at 8:22 am

    everton are so underated on fifas ea need to sort it out

  • phil
    September 19, 2012 at 8:25 am

    everton underrated badly

    • dan
      September 24, 2012 at 11:12 am

      need to sort Baines, pienar should be 80 and if suarez is 86 jelavic should be 84

      • isaac
        September 27, 2012 at 5:50 am

        I think I have seen four comments now about how underated Everton are and i agree but you are naming players like jelavic as saying hes underated but I think Phil Jagielka should be atleast 83 he is one of the top English defenders but is constintly underreated.

  • JoshStocks
    September 19, 2012 at 10:14 pm

    i hope they edit the ratings before being released on teams such as west brom and everton should be much higher torres should be 82/83 not happy with the united budget.

  • September 21, 2012 at 10:24 am

    Nigerians are very angry with fifa because our national team played well this year and were not even considered they prefered cameroon who are flops fifa sucks

  • September 21, 2012 at 10:55 am

    Its not fair Nigeria played well Nigeria should be in fifa 13 we are not happy

  • zak
    September 21, 2012 at 12:45 pm

    really gerrard 83 really

    • Alex
      September 21, 2012 at 11:45 pm

      I know, It quite bad and this is cuz he has been injury. Why is vidic rating not gone down cuz he was out for a whole season. At least Liverpool rating isn’t has bad as I thought.

  • james
    September 21, 2012 at 4:47 pm

    Cant believe cleverly is only 78. Ashley young has gone down to. the people who decide the ratings are largly clueless.

  • Gareth
    September 22, 2012 at 10:27 am

    Cleverley 78? thats a joke, United 23m budget another joke and worst of all second half of the season scholes was arguably the best midfielder and again he’s 81? sort it out ea Prem is better than the spanish league and i bet Mardid and Barca all get 85+ ratings

  • Lewis
    September 22, 2012 at 2:43 pm

    Swansea’s budget is sooooo not that low…

    They sold;

    Rodgers and backroom – 7m
    Sinclair – 8.2m
    Allen – 15m
    and some other randomers probably getting about 1-1.5 between them…

    They also finished mid table.

    even with laudrup and some higher wages etc that should be almost 30 to spend.

    Then players bought;

    Hernandez – 5.5
    Ki – 5.5
    Bartley – 1
    Chico – 2
    Michu – 2
    and some youths and a few loans that I’d be surprised if much over 2m.

    That’s 18m…

    Even if we estimate high on buys and wages and low on sales their budget should definitely be nearer 10.

    • Lewis
      September 22, 2012 at 2:48 pm

      As for their player ratings, I think Rangel should be 1 lower and taylor 1 higher. And chico should be a couple lower.

    • Mike
      September 27, 2012 at 8:05 am

      I’d agree with you if the players they bought were not in the team at the beginning, but they are. So giving them 30m, plus already having Ki, Pablo, Chico etc, would be ridiculous. The budgets have to reflect what they would have at the beginning of the summer, not after all their sales, because the money from sales has been spent.

  • moooo
    September 22, 2012 at 5:20 pm

    Arsenal
    Podolski 86 Gervinho 83
    Arteta 83 Walcott 83
    Mertesacker 82
    Santi Cazorla 86
    Mannone 72
    diaby 78
    Vermaelen 85
    Jenkinson 65
    gibbs 79
    ramsey 77

    • Nathan
      September 25, 2012 at 3:42 pm

      Jenkinson has been playing too well to be only 65, i’d say 78 at least, gibbs too deserves 80, the ox should be at least 80, Koscielny 83, Gervinho 82, Poldi 85, Walcott 81 is fair

      • Mike
        September 27, 2012 at 8:06 am

        Jenkinosn has only played well this season though. Last year he was more than a little nervy.

        The weekly update system for form will put his stats up.

  • Benji
    September 23, 2012 at 4:11 pm

    Everton… seriously need to be reviewed. the 4.5 rating is fine, however one player over 80?
    compared to Lpool players/performance this is ridiculous

  • bradlee lewedio
    September 24, 2012 at 11:10 am

    odemwinge should be 90

  • dan
    September 24, 2012 at 11:15 am

    come on ea sort Evertons ratings out by friday

  • Daniel
    September 24, 2012 at 11:40 pm

    I seriously hope this is a joke. 2 great seasons and West Brom are still rated 3.5, less than
    Wigan and Swansea. With all due respect to these teams, we had a much better season than Wigan and Swansea. McAuley’s rating hasn’t moved when he has been fantastic and Olsson could quite easily be rated 77/78. Foster should be an 80 like he was at Birmingham, he hasn’t got any worse, if anything he has got better so i don’t see why the rating went down. The Canadians should stick to snowboarding and let the English stick to the football.

  • Billy
    September 25, 2012 at 3:38 am

    Why r livpool so bad, shud be 5 star but we just as bad as everton almost?? WHY GERRARD NOT 85 AT LEAST. F U EA. I still buy but not happy indeed.

    • Daniel
      September 27, 2012 at 2:52 pm

      I know he’s seriously underrated and ive been told Rooney supposed to be 94! WTF. Gerrard is and always will be better than Rooney!!!

    • Josh
      September 28, 2012 at 1:41 pm

      5 Star??? Don’t make me laugh.

      Maybe they have these ratings because they have played Man United, Arsenal & Man City all at home and got 1pt out of 9. Currently they are in the relegation zone with 2pts from 5 games, 3 of them home games and couldn’t manage to beat Sunderland and lost to WBA!!

      Stop living in the 80’s and realise Liverpool are no longer a top 4 team.

      Gerrard maybe should be 84 but Liverpool are definitely a 4.5 and not 5 star team…

      • Baines
        September 29, 2012 at 12:22 am

        Liverpool supporters are hilarious

      • stew
        September 30, 2012 at 7:40 am

        I’m a Liverpool fan and I agree 4.5, I even thought we were gonna go down to 4, but Gerrard should at least be 85, Agger, 84/85 and Skrtel at least 83… Oh and a boost for Sterling too. The likes of Downing, Adam etc. should depreciate.

    • September 28, 2012 at 4:26 pm

      what are you on about Gerrard’s to old now and liverpool finished 6th were as spurs and Newcastle + possibly arsnel but they lost vanpersie should be 5 star as they finished 3rd 4th and 5th all above chelsea and liverpool

  • Ben
    September 25, 2012 at 11:28 am

    i feel Jenkinson has been harddone to only being 66 the way he has started this season he should atleast be 70-71

    • JAMES H
      September 27, 2012 at 6:48 pm

      just up his rating on your own you know fifa always makes man utd and chelsea good lol VIDIC 89 really lol vermaelen is as good if Hazard is 87 thats a joke

  • Zoomer
    September 25, 2012 at 7:28 pm

    This is ridiculous. These teams are overrated. Fulham, QPR, Stoke, Wigan, Sunderlad 4 star????!!! Liverpool 4.5?!! WTF! Bayern, Real, Barca must be 7 star then.

  • arun elavaras
    September 26, 2012 at 2:03 pm

    de jong in man city…i think its fake

  • aleks
    September 26, 2012 at 2:16 pm

    allen should be around 81, 82 gerrard should be 85. horrible ratings fifa.

  • unknown
    September 26, 2012 at 2:36 pm

    how can they put cazorla as 84, are they high on drugs when they rate their players?? he should be atleast 87

  • Tamas Nagy
    September 26, 2012 at 3:43 pm

    This is a joke??? Wigan is 4 stars while Aston Villa is only 3.5!!! WTF???

  • Kasper Nygaard
    September 26, 2012 at 3:56 pm

    What level is it on? – amateur, world class, or what+

  • b
    September 26, 2012 at 7:30 pm

    everyones overreacting when you play career mode the ratings go up anyways

  • Ed
    September 27, 2012 at 7:06 am

    They have massively underrated the QPR budget.. I mean only 8 million? They bought Granero for 9 million, and M’Bia for about 5. Surely that budget should be a lot higher, and they also still have a lot of money left, especially as their owner has his own F1 team and his own airline..

  • Yeshua
    September 27, 2012 at 1:23 pm

    I think people forget (or didn’t know in the first place) that Hazard has won the UNFP Ligue 1 Player of the Year twice and “…has earned critical acclaim for his playing style, which has led to the media, coaches, and players drawing comparisons to FIFA World Player of the Year winners Lionel Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo.”

  • Daniel
    September 27, 2012 at 2:59 pm

    Liverpool has to be one of the most underrated teams. Sterling 68, Allen 78, Borini 77 and Gerrard 83??????!!!!!! are you kidding me.Sterling shouls at least be more than 70, Allen should easily be an 80 or 81, Borini should be a 79 or 80 and Gerrard should at least be an 88. He’s the best midfielder in the premier league for god sake!!!

  • September 27, 2012 at 5:26 pm

    get a grip the lot of u ******* nerds hahahah

  • JAMES H
    September 27, 2012 at 6:43 pm

    VIDIC 89 HAVING A LAUGH HIS ALWAYS INJURED not surpise though he does play for man utd so they make all there players better

    • September 28, 2012 at 10:23 am

      hahahahahaha vidic is one of the best defenders in the prem u pleb

      • stew
        September 30, 2012 at 7:27 am

        That’s complete bullcrap.He is constantly injured, and apparently, Agger is 83?!??! That’s. Just underrating. The second year in a row and he was fit and effective most of last season.

        • Tom
          October 22, 2012 at 6:12 pm

          Vidic is one of the best CBs in the world, just because he spent a season out doesn’t mean he should be rated less… and maybe if Liverpool played half decent for once they would have better ratings.

  • Tom
    September 27, 2012 at 7:55 pm

    why west ham budget so low we bought Jarvis for 10.5 million and signed Carroll

    • Joseph B
      October 2, 2012 at 4:01 pm

      because they signed those players, if you had those players and a big budget it would be stupid, fulham sold dempsey and dembele for more than 20 million and the budget is only 10

  • Bob
    September 27, 2012 at 9:51 pm

    why does everyone love gerrard so much hes shit and completley overated at 83

    • Daniel
      September 28, 2012 at 2:42 pm

      How the hell is gerrard rubbish? He’s freakin amazin. I bet u you your a man utd fanboy who thinks rooneys the best player in the world. If u think gerrards rubbish then u dont know footbal

    • stew
      September 30, 2012 at 7:32 am

      Gerrard is shit? Definitely a Man Utd fan. Wake up and realise that just like RVP, if he joined man utd, they would worship him, and he’ll be like 97.

      • Tom
        November 29, 2012 at 10:00 am

        Late to the party, but who cares? Gerrard is useless. Utterly useless and I’m an Arsenal fan, before you ask.

        He has consistently underperformed for the last 2 years, he has scored 4 goals from open play in 14 months in the league. He is a bag of wank.

        Scholes, Lampard & Wilshere are 3 English CM’s that are better than him currently. Lampard is possibly dropping away but that’s partially because he’s benched with the income of “the 3 amigos” into the Chelski side. Still, when he plays he does a better job than Gerrard.

        Just look at Liverpools position, the only player in the Liverpool squad that looks above decent is Suarez and he’s still overrated in terms of finishing, he has averaged 9 shots a game this season. In two separate games he had 16 shots and managed to only put 4 and 6 on target in those games. He is a GREAT player, but not a great finisher. Stats don’t lie.

        In my honest opinion about the Arsenal side:
        Gervinho – overrated, should be 75 at best.
        Chamakh – should not be gold on FUT. 74, max.
        Jenkinson – underrated, should be 72/73.
        Ramsey – overrated, again should be 75 at best.
        Sagna – overrated, should be 80 at best, he consistently under performs, has a terrible touch and his pace is gone.
        Walcott – I think is slightly underrated, the last 2 seasons before this one he had started to show he can finish and he’s continued it this year, he should be 82/83 in my opinion.
        Fabianksi – How is he still gold in FUT? He is useless.
        Gibbs – Underrated, should be at least 80. But in fairness he has always struggled to keep fit. My only complaint is that if Vidic holds 89 even though he’s missed more than an entire season through injury, surely Gibbs shouldn’t be negatively rated because of his injuries?

  • suliman
    September 28, 2012 at 10:53 am

    raheem sterling 68! are you mad more like 75

  • Bob Cazoling Roberto Suterio
    September 28, 2012 at 10:54 am

    Hello
    Heskey – 99

  • Luke
    October 1, 2012 at 7:28 pm

    I can’t believe no one has mentioned Wayne Rooney’s stupidly high rating i mean come on he only ever scores penalties or some poor to average quality goals, and how come vidic is still 89 he didnt play at all last season and he wasnt even that good before! also in the championship teams many players are really low like michael chopra went down 4 and many others lost rating aswell.

    CHELSEA ALL THE WAY!!!

  • Joseph B
    October 2, 2012 at 3:59 pm

    how is no one complaining about fulham, they sold dembele and dempsey and got a small budget, and they finished one place below liverpool last year beating them twice.

  • October 19, 2012 at 5:39 pm

    That’s not fair why is Rooney and Ashley downgraded.

  • October 23, 2012 at 2:58 pm

    LOOOOOOOOOOOOL Everton Best player is Tim Howard (GK) worst player is an Midfielder who can play attacking midfield!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Mason
    October 29, 2012 at 2:35 pm

    Why is Chelsea’s budget so low: we spent 80 million in summer and still want more!

  • November 1, 2012 at 7:18 pm

    tbh ur all complaining about crap FIFA rated these players and it only matters how the players play in-game. I think that QPR bugdet is too low they could compete with man city and chelsea etc in a transfer market if they wanted. Vidic is the best cb in the world so shut up Everton this and everton that Everton run on david moyed without him theyd be screwed and as for jelavic he has no pace and is lucky to be rated 77 more like a 74 silver on FUT. AND finally hazard is class he could walk around half the teams in the prem Wigan Everton sunderland etc 4 4.5 and 3.5 star teams dont make me laugh FIFA need a 10 star rating system not 5

    • zam
      November 3, 2012 at 10:34 am

      totally agree with @josh,but seriously EA need to improve a lot in the cmg years

    • Kevin
      December 13, 2012 at 5:17 pm

      Vidic is not even nominated to the top 20 defenders in the world so i dont think so, Thiago Silva all the way!

    • EFC till i die
      January 9, 2013 at 10:42 pm

      josh you do not know anything if you think that vidic is the best centre back in the world. He WAS but now he is just decent, and everton are a great team (not being arragant because I support them)with limited resources and yes David Moyes has had a massive influence on us but that’s because our board are LOYAL.(man utd by seeing you boner about vidic). Also if you did happen to know anything about football you would understand that pace isn’t everything, but you get dis-illusioned with the game because 1. you don’t know the game anyway. and 2. fifa isn’t too realistic- pace dominates the game so you assume that a REAL LIFE STRIKER is poor because he has no pace.  Your Hazard observation is true but you need to learn a bit more about the game because you are DUM when it comes to REAL-LIFE football!

  • Dre
    November 7, 2012 at 5:41 pm

    Its just a stupid game, if you are unhappy then you edit the players to whatever rating you choose. Edit gerrard to 88 if you wish, edit Vidic to 81 if you wish… you bought the game so suit yourself and stop complaining. There will always be discrepancies, ppl will always want their favourite players to be rated high. Eg. Gerrard, Liverpool fans want him at 88, Everton/ManU fans would say he his 78 at most, EA averaged it to be 83… wats the big deal. Grow up you kids! there is life OUTSIDE of FIFA, a life filled with fun things, money, sex, religion or just the fact that you are breathing should make you happy. Cheer up you sorry ‘gameheads’. ROFL

    • Tom
      November 29, 2012 at 10:03 am

      I’m sorry but while what you are saying is kind of right, in terms of people will always want certain people rated differently from someone else. Your point about getting a life is kind of redundant, you’ve gone out of your way to insult people on a comments section of a website, think about that.

      I won’t recheck this. I don’t care if me replying to you means I don’t have a life. I’m okay with that. Are you?

  • emmitt
    December 19, 2012 at 6:03 am

    Baggies and red men all the way

Leave a Response